

The results of this empirical assessment were further validated by an industry panel of subject-matter experts (SMEs). One particular dimension of the analysis, the issue of authority without responsibility, is also discussed. During their first off-site session, Kathryn explains the five dysfunctions of a team: Absence of trust Fear of conflict Lack of commitment Avoidance of accountability Inattention to resultsThese dysfunctions are accompanied by their symptoms, invulnerability, artificial harmony, ambiguity, low standards and status plus ego respectively. The proposed framework is presented as tested in a live project portfolio setting where organizational modifications were identified, simulated, and implemented. While we build upon Rasmussen's dynamic safety model and address the need for a framework to assess causal factors that influence behaviors in the context of an energy-sector project, we do this with a view to a future where technology (e.g., artificial intelligence (AI), automation, robotics, etc.) will play an ever-increasing role. The underlying hypothesis is a structured approach to identifying, assessing, and proactively addressing BCIRs that have the potential to improve a project team's ability to meet its objectives. A user-friendly framework is proposed to identify and quantitatively assess BCIRs, along with the conditions that initiate them throughout the project development cycle. For this work, metanetwork (e.g., a network of networks) analysis was applied to emergent behavior-centric intangible risks (BCIRs) in a portfolio of projects in the energy sector.


Industrial projects can be viewed as complex sociotechnical systems (e.g., human agents interacting with technology) where cause-and-effect relationships do not necessarily occur in time-and-space proximity. The Five Dysfunctions of a Team (Manga Edition): An Illustrated Leadership Fable / Edition 1 by Patrick Lencioni, Kensuke Okabayashi 4.0 (2) Paperback View All Available Formats & Editions Buy New 26.00 Buy Used 17.
